Skip to content

[Snyk] Fix for 4 vulnerabilities #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2025

Conversation

cb-ecs-tools
Copy link
Collaborator

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 4 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json
  • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Incorrect Authorization
SNYK-JS-VITE-9653016
  803  
medium severity Incorrect Authorization
SNYK-JS-VITE-9512410
  752  
medium severity Access Control Bypass
SNYK-JS-VITE-9576207
  688  
medium severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-9292519
  631  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
🦉 Access Control Bypass

@cb-alish cb-alish self-requested a review April 9, 2025 03:38
@cb-alish cb-alish merged commit 273c63c into main Apr 9, 2025
4 checks passed
@cb-alish cb-alish deleted the snyk-fix-19c5455de9708e70a9213791a7d9257c branch April 16, 2025 12:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants